March 29, 2017
Deeper Look – Episode 29 (2017)
The following video is meant to be a generalization, without ANY fine detail, as a starting block to larger and longer-term conversation about where on earth is will be least negatively affected by what’s coming in earth’s future- namely the solar grand minimum effects and earth’s magnetic reversal. I used CHILDISH shapes and lines for the purposes of keeping it as simple as possible while attempting to communicate the most basic macro-scale points we’ve parsed out from our research. We will show high risk areas that will inevitably have small area inside them get lucky, and in some of the lower risk zones there may be a deadly storm here and there. Hopefully you can understand that this is a starting block, and take in this material without too much anxiety.
Leave a Comment
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
What about South America? I assume it’s mostly going to be unaffected?
That was the part I was talking about- how we would be breaking down the entire globe in detail. This is just based on what we have broken down before. The monsoon patterns definitely change in the rainforest (already started), and we may find out why ancestors chose to live in such harsh places like the high deserts of Peru and Chile (very much like the high desert of new mexico). However the earthquakes are likely to have major effects on the coast, and normally wet areas will be low on water while areas unaccustomed to large rainfalls may see flooding unlike anything in centuries.
Thanks. I have EMAG2: Earth Magnetic Anomaly Grid data loaded up in my Google Earth maps as a layer. I am in East Texas, in your red zone for the United States. The anomaly is barking at the door. Thank you.
Did you say heat in Phoenix during the Maunder Minimum?
yes, it can still get hot in mini-ice ages… and the extreme swings won’t let up in summertime.
You list AZ and NM as the best place to live, you don’t feel that the volcanic fields throughout the area pose a risk? Yellowstone’s eq’s have been slowly getting stronger with increased drumbeats as of late. NV has had small swarms that the locals report they’ve never felt before. Magma is moving at an increasing rate under the entire western half of the country imo.
Yellowstone is not a risk at all. The periodic quake upticks and geyser upticks are the pressure release… the very thing that lets us know it is fine. If those stop for a decade I’ll wonder where pressure is building.
there alot of small earthquake activity in the south Appalachia all across south eastern tn north ga .. light blue area you have marked..what the odds of them getting larger when the new Madrid awakens…
Yo Ben
I am on the central West coast, just south of SF.
Here we have trees like the bristlecone pine and sempervarian redwoods.
These trees are intolerant of extremes, both heat and cold, yet live for thousands of years. (There are two different species of long lived redwoods, both in China and in the Sierra foothills, both on the same latitude but the Chinese trees are deciduous and the Sierra trees are a bit more cold tolerant.)
This indicates to me, the coastal region of Cali, from Big Sur to the bottom of Oregon, has “weathered” the GSM weather, through many if not countless GSMs over time. Given the extreme longevity of these organisms and the time required for them to evolve, it seems my region is another blue region (Snowflakes notwithstanding…;)
My question is…
Is it your opinion, that earthquakes and volcanoes are my threat or do you see extreme climate shifts up-ending my comparatively benign seasonal variations?
Curious grasshoppers wanna know!
Thanks Ban!
Knowladge is power 🙂
I leave in Poland/ Wroclaw- city, once getting in to the details please don’t miss my place:)
I was thinking about Greece as a place to leave at some point.
Again thank you,
It is game changer having you, EU, Pierc Corbyn and many others on the right side of FORCE!
Ak!
Apologies for typos!
*Ben!
what about u.k?
The purple line for Australia is definitely in the wrong place. It is way too far north and also doesn’t account for the elevated areas just inland from the East Coast. I live in the SW of Western Australia and you have to understand that even minor frost is actually noteworthy in winter here and even in inland regions -5C is considered extreme weather.
Im with you. Im in Manjimup and frosts do happen but very rarely. Back in the 40s they were growning tabacco here. Now its mostly Potatoes, Apples and Avacadoes (yuck). I would suggest that the SW corner of WA and West coast of Tasmania have the second and third tallest trees in the world for a good reason. Good rainfall and mild winters. The biggest concern is the pole shift and related radiation exposure. Relatively stable geography with only the Yilgarn block being active and only 2 known very extinct volcanic regions, makes us fairly safe. But as Ben says, this is my opinion.
‘What about the UK?’. I think that during the Maunder Minimum, people actually moved from parts of Northen Europe to the UK because it was slightly milder there due to the Gulf Stream. So perhaps it won’t be so bad there. But it would be interesting to hear what Ben says about it when his conference is finished.
Ps Elijah. When I was living in Balingup, we did have a number of -8 mornings that went unreported as Balingup didnt/doesnt have a AWS. Those mornings Jarrahwood was -3, which were reported as they have AWS.
Interesting to compare this to a map of the Deagel predictions. I would suggest there is a fairly good connection; particularly if you concentrate on societies very reliant on electric power grids, 24 hour food supply lines etc. How is Bulgaria looking, too far north?