October 16, 20172017-10-162017-10-16http://suspicious0bservers.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/SzeroSquare.pngSuspicious0bservers - Earthquakes | Space Weather | Cosmologyhttp://suspicious0bservers.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/SzeroSquare.png200px200px
Also, since the ” gravitational Waves ” appeared at relatively the same time as the other observations, IF they are Gravitational Waves,— that would put the idea that gravity is instantaneously transmitted across the known universe in doubt.
Gravitational waves, faster than gamma ray emissions?
Perhaps the “gravitational waves” are a variant form of electromagnetism, perhaps somehow perturbing the “ether”, in a way that scientists cannot explain, given the limited set of variables they choose to recognize, hence they describe them as gravitational.
Am I the only one that is aghast that “gravitational waves” can travel 2 seconds faster, over that vast distance, than gamma ray emissions? Hmmmmmm.
Agreed, one and the same. Like an explosion seen, THEN, the sound is heard – distant being the variable. Two different ways of experiencing the same thing. In response to oregano11’s good point above, just call them emissions, emission waves. I think they are trying to clump to much together under terms that don’t fit. The vibrations, waves, frequency… emissions are transmitted instantaneously, not gravity. Gravitational waves are still in question, as the term is mis-leading and needs to be buried with Einstein. Quantum, waves/particles, not gravity.
I would attempt to suspend judgement on behalf of the perspective; we may just be misunderstanding the data because of they we are interpreting it. For instance because of the timing of, we may have to look at what a gravity distortion really is, in terms of how we perceive it’s role withing the electrical universe.
Cavity is caused by motion just like when you put children and I ride at the carnival and the floor drops off and the children remain against the side of the wall it’s in there it’s caused by inertia and that’s the aftereffect were say come on
Also, since the ” gravitational Waves ” appeared at relatively the same time as the other observations, IF they are Gravitational Waves,— that would put the idea that gravity is instantaneously transmitted across the known universe in doubt.
Gravitational waves, faster than gamma ray emissions?
Perhaps the “gravitational waves” are a variant form of electromagnetism, perhaps somehow perturbing the “ether”, in a way that scientists cannot explain, given the limited set of variables they choose to recognize, hence they describe them as gravitational.
Am I the only one that is aghast that “gravitational waves” can travel 2 seconds faster, over that vast distance, than gamma ray emissions? Hmmmmmm.
Agreed, one and the same. Like an explosion seen, THEN, the sound is heard – distant being the variable. Two different ways of experiencing the same thing. In response to oregano11’s good point above, just call them emissions, emission waves. I think they are trying to clump to much together under terms that don’t fit. The vibrations, waves, frequency… emissions are transmitted instantaneously, not gravity. Gravitational waves are still in question, as the term is mis-leading and needs to be buried with Einstein. Quantum, waves/particles, not gravity.
I would attempt to suspend judgement on behalf of the perspective; we may just be misunderstanding the data because of they we are interpreting it. For instance because of the timing of, we may have to look at what a gravity distortion really is, in terms of how we perceive it’s role withing the electrical universe.
Reminds me of some of the cave drawings that were found. That spiral design may have already happened before.
Cavity is caused by motion just like when you put children and I ride at the carnival and the floor drops off and the children remain against the side of the wall it’s in there it’s caused by inertia and that’s the aftereffect were say come on
I’m pretty sure cavities are caused by sugar.
That’s no moon, it’s a space station!